Consenso y disenso global sobre las políticas de drogas
16 abril, 2016
UNGASS 2016: ¿hito histórico u oportunidad perdida?
16 abril, 2016
Mostrar todo

Poniendo el acento en la falta de acceso a medicamentos controlados durante los preparativos de la UNGASS 2016

La redacción del documento final adoptado por la Comisión de Estupefacientes incluye unos términos prometedores sobre “el alivio del dolor y el sufrimiento”. Más información, en inglés, está disponible abajo.

Suscríbase a las Alertas mensuales del IDPC para recibir información sobre cuestiones relacionadas con políticas sobre drogas. 


By Dr Katherine Pettus

Just after midnight on March 22 in Vienna, the Commission on Narcotic Drugs adopted the Outcome Document to be presented to UN member states who will attend the General Assembly on the World Drug Problem scheduled for April 19-21 in New York City.

This article summarises the main points of the Outcome Document and the CND session relating to controlled medicines.

The document contains a set of well worded recommendations to assist countries in improving access to controlled essential medicines for “the relief of pain and suffering.” 

Finding consensus

Since the CND works by consensus rather than by vote, member states with different points of view about an issue have to work together to draft language that suits the interests of all.

A lot of discussion took place over the language in the controlled medicines section of the outcome document, according to member state colleagues who were in the room and reported back . 

Click here to read the full article.            

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

Thumbnail: Flickr Alan Levine



Fuente

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *